CHILDREN
DIE IN WARS
(One Family’s
Toll on a Cruel Day: 7 Children with Amputated Legs https://nyti.ms/2leRxdc)
The following is part of an article published by
UNICEF in 1996. “Children have, of
course, always been caught up in warfare. They usually have little choice but
to experience, at minimum, the same horrors as their parents—as casualties or
even combatants. And children have always been particularly exposed. When food
supplies have run short, it is children who have been hardest hit, since their
growing bodies need steady supplies of essential nutrients. When water supplies
have been contaminated, it is children who have had the least resistance to the
dangers of disease. And the trauma of exposure to violence and brutal death has
emotionally affected generations of young people for the rest of their lives.”
During the 20th century, the numbers of children, and
of all innocent civilians, who died in wars steadily increased. According to
UNICEF, this was partly due to “advances” in technology. “Aerial bombardment
has extended the potential battle zone to entire national territories. World
War II saw a massive increase in indiscriminate killings, with the bombings of
Coventry and Dresden, for example, and the atomic bombs that were dropped on
Hiroshima and Nagasaki. And this pattern was repeated in the Vietnam war,
which is estimated to have cost 2.5 million lives.”
The UNICEF report goes on to say, “A further cause of
the rising death toll for civilians is that most contemporary conflicts are not
between States, but within them. Rather than being set-piece battles between
contending armies, these are much more complex affairs—struggles between the
military and civilians, or between contending groups of armed civilians. They
are as likely to be fought in villages and suburban streets as anywhere else.”
“Families and children are not just getting caught in
the crossfire, they are also likely to be specific targets. This is because
many contemporary struggles are between different ethnic groups in the same
country or in former States. When ethnic loyalties prevail, a perilous logic
clicks in. The escalation from ethnic superiority to ethnic cleansing to
genocide, as we have seen, can become an irresistible process. Killing adults
is then not enough; future generations of the enemy—their children—must also be
eliminated. As one political commentator ex-pressed it in a 1994 radio
broadcast before violence erupted in Rwanda, "To kill the big rats, you
have to kill the little rats."*
A
much more recent example of this is what is currently happening in the Syrian
civil war, where researchers have found significant evidence that bombs were
targeting civilians, including women and children. According to a recent report,
“In the past seven years, barrel bombs have killed [Syrian] civilians almost
exclusively, an international team of scientists report Wednesday. Civilians
comprised 97 percent of the deaths from these bombs.”
(A
barrel bomb is essentially a large metal container filled with explosives and
shrapnel. These bombs can be incredibly powerful, decimating entire city
blocks. They are very imprecise weapons. Often, they are dropped from
low-flying helicopters onto densely populated parts of cities.)
In
addition, “The study also finds a dramatic rise in the number of children killed
as the war [in Syria] has progressed. Children represented a small proportion
of deaths, about 9 percent, in the first two years of the war. But since 2013,
that proportion has more than doubled. Now nearly 1 in 4 civilian deaths are
children. So far, at least 14,000 children have been killed in Syria by
snipers, machine guns, missiles, grenades, roadside bombs and aerial bombs.
About a thousand children have been executed. And more than a hundred were
tortured and then executed.”
Nearly
a million civilians have died in wars and conflicts since 2001. A significant
percentage of them have been children.
*For
the record, this line of thought has been used many times before. In Vietnam,
the United States believed that a victory over the Vietcong was to be achieved
by quantifiable “kill ratios,” to reach that elusive tipping point where the
insurgency could no longer replenish its troops. This approach hard-wired
incentives to secure a high “body count” down the chain of command, with the
result that U.S. soldiers often shot civilians dead to pad their tallies and
thereby move up the ranks. It is estimated that more than 2 million Vietnamese
civilians were killed in that war.
No comments:
Post a Comment